Chief Jones:

I will respectfully stand by until 0800 CST on 06 JUL 2026 for your department to produce evidence of providing proper equal access to the Marshalltown Police Department’s law enforcement public accommodations and services regarding de-escalation attempts. This relates directly to the evidence I have reported to your department, which I believe easily meets the threshold of requirements the State of Iowa utilized during its criminalization of my service-connected mental health disabilities through its application of Iowa Code Section 708.7 while criminalizing my service-connected mental health disabilities and public records work from December 2018 – December 2026.

Further, it is my belief that the evidence supporting the anomalies I have experienced within your department, specifically related to LT Hillers’ testimony as shown in recent chest cam footage I publicly released, may provide evidence of retaliation by the City of Marshalltown – Local Government. This specifically relates to historical concerns regarding the city’s actions against those with mental health disabilities and civil court documents I have historically filed in Marshall County court against the very government body that now is producing evidence of not facilitating proper law enforcement efforts while safeguarding the rights, liberties, and wellbeing of a twenty-year honorably retired veteran against the acts of hostility and intimidation of an individual who has self-reported to be a State of Iowa convicted felon.

I retired from the public records battlefield on or about 01 MAY 2026 to pursue a life of peace and forgiveness within the grace of my Lord Jesus Christ to study the teachings of Martin Luther and Saint Augustine of Hippo. However, within this moment, I believe that I have no other choice other than filing a civil rights complaint against the City of Marshalltown, IA, and civil court documents in state and federal court against the Iowa Civil Rights Commission and the Iowa Public Information Board while providing evidence that I believe supports that the Iowa Legislature’s House File 2490 (HF 2490) was drafted and signed into law on a foundation of service-connected mental health-based discrimination and criminalization. At the same time, the evidence supports that Governor Kim Reynolds and her political appointees, the Office of the Attorney General of Iowa, and Honorable Chief Justice Susan Christensen (through the improper processing of attorney misconduct complaints) produced evidence of violating the Iowa Code and Court Rules while protecting and safeguarding their own political agendas and institutional reputations over the proper manifestation of the rule of law and the equal manifestation of protecting the rights and liberties of all.

https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2023/09/22/how-one-mans-actions-led-to-proposed-new-limits-on-public-records-access

https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=91&ba=HF2490

The Form of Republican 24-Karat Golden Crosses

Governor Kim Reynolds
Office of the Attorney General of Iowa,

What does this article truly provide evidence supporting? It’s my opinion, when considering this article in context with all of the public records showing the actions of your political appointees as identified by various Iowa Code requirements and the evidence supporting the public records that AG Brenna Bird sought to conceal, I respectfully submit one paradigm becomes brutally apparent:

Both of you have the capacity to put a significantly damaged, law-abiding veteran with a documented history of suicidal ideations, critical mental health hospitalizations, and inpatient mental health treatment up on a chair under a false light that the evidence supports you both manufactured, while placing a metaphysical rope around his neck (state-produced false allegations of criminal conduct supported by zero evidence) and applying enough public pressure while waiting for him to jump.

Neither of you are leaders. The evidence supports you are simply popularity contest winners (and by MAGA publicly communicated standards possible DEI hires) that the evidence indicates were properly and lawfully exposed by an honorably retired veteran, leading to the actions under your alleged leadership documented in the above article.

Shipmate: Merritt, you’ve got nothing. All you have is a stack of Lutheran reference books. You deleted your investigative database, you deleted your email archive, you dismissed what statutory vehicles you had a few months ago. We’ve got nothing to work with.

Cipher Hunter: That is inaccurate. All we need is one legendary court document that will survive a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, providing us the opportunity to subpoena in federal court all of my case files and the evidence within them that the historical records shows the Iowa Civil Rights Commission swept under the rug to protect other State of Iowa government bodies and this work will be finished (see John 19:30). At the same time, by including the Iowa Public Information Board and all of the relevant records I submitted to the IPIB, I believe any reasonable federal judge will see HF 2490 for what it is. The weakness regarding HF 2490 is not within the alleged vexatious argument the state has brought forth, but within the constitutional reality that dictates the following key points:

The First Amendment dictates the state cannot abridge a citizen’s right to freedom of speech during a redress of grievances; and

The state cannot restrict access to rights and liberties without conviction in a court of law for a crime (see US Constitution, 5th Amendment; IA Constitution, Article I, Section 9).

Therefore, constitutional law indicates that lawful protest included within a properly formatted request for public records cannot be quantified and capped, or otherwise hindered or abridged to a specific number of communications, as doing so constitutes clear evidence of the abridgment of speech during the redress of a grievance. At the same time, HF 2490 completely disregards the evidence supporting the state’s historical violations of Iowa Code Chapters 22 and 23 regarding disregard for properly formatted public records requests/complaints, excessive fees not supported by Iowa Code Section 22.3, and other acts of misconduct or Iowa Code violations that may have facilitated the need for additional public records requests. Furthermore, as long as a citizen’s conduct remains lawful and professional, the state has no basis in law regarding the restriction of any form of speech or public communications.

Here’s a $20 go get some Mountain Dew in the Ship’s Store we have a long deployment ahead of us. I will take care of all legal strategy. I need you to finish the Baserow and n8n configs so that we can finally go home. Look I know we are all tired, we are sick, none of us want to be here, but this is what we were fucking trained to do. This is what we were born to do. We have two choices we can all turn to our own vices and disappear at a local legion bar, or we can build something lawful and constitutionally legendary that protects the rights and liberties of all of God’s children that we have served for the last 30 years of our lives while showing these shore based non quals in federal court how we roll in 5th Fleet. Are you with me?

Legal Disclaimer: This public post does not communicate or insinuate a past, present, or future violation of the United States Code or the Iowa Code. Furthermore, the author is not currently experiencing thoughts of self-harm or thoughts of harming others. Consequently, any actions by law enforcement that result in unwarranted personal disturbance—including unwarranted welfare checks, the restraint of liberties within a medical facility, or any other interventions inconsistent with proper mental health risk mitigation—may be construed as a violation of Iowa Code Chapter 216 (Iowa Civil Rights Act).

#cipherhunter